Some thoughts on Beyond Broadcast 26 February 2007, 12:01
Most interesting presenters at MIT’s Beyond Broadcast:
Mike Lanza of click.tv, pioneering interactive flash capability where users can add text/comments/multimedia WITHIN another’s video online.
Jennifer Harris of the Center for Digital Democracy, who was not afraid to argue with Chuck DeFeo about what democratic participation is really about, and who also spoke to the need for talking about access as a primary issue (yay!) before you can talk about participation — because, even in Web 2.0, it’s not “many to many” user-generated content or citizen journalism if a large percentage of citizens don’t even have sufficient access to participate online. She also spoke about the presidential election, and what new media outreach really means for candidates if it’s not completely transparent.
Tad Hirsch of MIT’s Media Lab diversified the group with an international & activist perspective, as well as some very sensible thoughts on participation and access and some examples of progressive telephony projects. Well done, Tad.
The afternoon session on the future of web video was interesting and innovative, in the same way that being a character in a political cartoon might be interesting and innovative. The room was full of a cadre of well-qualified media makers representing a diversity of backgrounds: academics, TV, radio and web producers, bloggers, marketing reps, international rights advocates, me. Then there was the obviously-brilliant-but-incomprehensible-crazy-lady obsessed with the future of copyright, and the obviously-brilliant-but-completely-weird-lady obsessed with censorship who sat in the front row, nodding her head and knitting. I bet you $20 they both went to Smith.
Anyway.
After some mildly painful discussion on “We need to make a We-Tube!” without addressing who the “we” is, exactly (academics? citizens with resources, education, and access? Americans?) we broke into subgroups. My group was dubbed “You’re dreaming”, because we speculated about the future of web video and its potential is for participation and interactivity, including the creation of a visual wiki; embedded, editable dynamic text; mobile video capabilities; massive portable archives; and live video streaming online from any type of handheld device.
My pal Mohan was distressed that we weren’t discussing concrete issues: financing companies, bandwidth restrictions, compliance with standards upgrades, business plans. Others were coming at it from a more technical angle (technology can do anything!) and a more realistic angle (we’re human; technology can never do everything), especially as related to documenting life.
Overall, it was a good conference with tons of interesting people, but less lectures and more interactivity would have made it better, though the live posting of questions during presentations was neat. Working groups should have been tasked with coming up with proposals for addressing issues in media — I think that would have been a constructive/creative exercise.
Here’s BB’s list of recommended reading for the 13 other people who read this blog and might be interested.
Enough of that. I’m retiring from attending conferences until at least, um, April.